Pre Existing

Learn about Pre Existing and your legal options after an accident.

Pre-existing conditions can complicate injury claims, but they do not prevent recovery. If an accident worsens a prior injury, compensation may still be available for aggravation or acceleration of that condition. Insurance companies often argue that symptoms stem from prior medical issues rather than the accident itself. However, the law generally allows recovery when a negligent act aggravates a pre-existing condition. Medical records comparing pre- and post-accident status are essential in proving worsening symptoms. Physicians may provide opinions regarding causation and increased impairment. While pre-existing conditions may reduce settlement value in some cases, they do not eliminate liability when the accident clearly worsened health outcomes. Detailed medical documentation and expert evaluation are critical to overcome insurer arguments.

Pre Existing image
Documentation quality and long-term impact both influence case value.

What to Do Next

Gather prior and current medical records, obtain physician opinions on aggravation, and avoid statements that minimize accident-related worsening.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. A pre-existing condition does not block a claim if the accident aggravated or accelerated it. The law generally allows recovery for that additional harm, even though the underlying condition existed before the crash. What matters is showing a measurable change in symptoms or function after the collision. Insurers routinely argue that current pain stems from the old injury rather than the new impact, so the burden falls on the claimant to draw a clear before-and-after line using medical evidence rather than personal description alone.

It can, since insurers often try to attribute symptoms to the earlier condition instead of the crash. But a lower estimate is not the same as no recovery. Aggravation of an existing injury remains compensable when the worsening is documented. The outcome depends heavily on how clearly medical records distinguish pre-accident status from post-accident decline, and whether a physician is willing to state that the collision, not the old condition alone, caused the added impairment.

Prior medical records establishing baseline condition, paired with post-accident records showing new or worsened symptoms, are essential. This comparison lets a physician distinguish what existed before the crash from what changed afterward. Without prior records, insurers can claim the current condition was always present. Consistent treatment history after the accident also matters, since gaps make it harder to connect the worsening directly to the collision rather than the natural progression of the original condition.

Yes. A treating physician can compare pre- and post-accident findings and offer a medical opinion on causation, stating whether the crash worsened or accelerated the prior condition. This kind of expert opinion carries more weight with insurers than a claimant's own account of increased pain. Avoid statements that minimize how the accident affected the condition, since offhand remarks are often used later to argue the injury was unrelated to the crash.

Get the Compensation You Deserve

Our experienced rear-end collision attorneys are ready to fight for you. No fee unless you win.

Call Now Free Review